7 Comments
User's avatar
That Umberella's avatar

This ruling is hard to believe. Whoever made it has obviously been captured by ‘gender ideology’ & are promoting an abusive charter to appease the ‘trans’ activist lunatics.

Oscar's avatar

Another case where my first thought is - I must be misunderstanding. But it really is just as it reads.

When people tell you who they are, believe them.

Anne Harris's avatar

Wow, just wow. That sounds like an abuser’s charter to me.

Oscar's avatar

It's "she was asking for it" with a uniform on, isnt it.

Sex Realist's avatar

I don't fucking believe it! HOW can they possibly rule against?? The argument is watertight!

Charles Bourne's avatar

Absolutely unbelievable. What the hell has sadomasochism got to do with it? Monty Python eat your hearts out.

Digital Canary 💪💪🇨🇦🇺🇦🗽's avatar

It’s as though these people have never heard of bad actors & of coercive control behaviours. Or that they think we haven’t.

But seriously, “consensual law breaking” as a concept belongs nowhere near justice systems!