On 16th April 2025, the UK Supreme Court delivered its landmark judgment: the terms “man” and “woman” in the Equality Act 2010 refer to biological sex, and they always have.
Yawn, the narcissistic feminists that only care about women are at it again, No wonder why men board planes for the Philippines, and leave Western women to their cats
The level of misogyny in your comment is off the scale. Not only are you saying that women shouldn’t care about women’s issues, despite centuries of unequal treatment, you’re also belittling them in two very important ways: 1) women who care about women’s issues aren’t worthy of men’s love, and 2) women in countries like the Philippines don’t care about their own rights or issues affecting their sex (in an unpleasant way playing into ugly stereotypes). This is a great example of misogynistic behaviour.
Your comment about feminists caring about women is very funny though. What else are feminists to be worried about? It is in the name.
I said that women who ONLY care about women’s issues, and were indifferent ro male issues, were not worthy of a man’s attention. That’s not “misogyny”, that’s calling a spade a spade,. Men only associate with women that value them
Dude, feminism is about women, not men. It was born out of women’s struggles of living in an unfair and unjust society, and its purpose was to improve the quality of women’s lives. It has nothing to do with men. You can’t call a feminist a narcissist because the focus is on women. The label is on the tin. Admitting this doesn’t diminish the issues of relevance to men. That’s just another space.
Hate for men iis also built into feminism. In the US, feminists in Congress, and their male enablers, created 10 offices for women’s health, but ignored men’s health
There is no hate against men in feminism. As I’ve described it above, feminism focuses on bettering the situation of women. It’s got nothing against or for men. Dealing with men-related issues is something else, deserving of its own advocacy. I hope that you can see these are two different issues and interest in them doesn’t preclude the other.
You say that men would go for women who value and respect them. Don’t forget that this goes both ways. Both partners to a relationship should value and respect each other. It should never be the case that one gives and the other takes.
Here is a feminist page from Stanford University. Notice how they call men’s advocates “bad guys”, and state, “if men are the problem……” That is obvious misandry - hate for men.
I have received four employment settlements for sex discrimination against men, because the feminists in human resources never even tried to hide their discrimination against men.
In the UK, Erin Pizzey founded the first women’s domestic violence shelter in the mid-1970s. She noticed that many women at the shelter committed acts of violence against other shelter residents. Erin reported that, and feminists in the UK made death threats against her, and chased her out of England.
In the ,mid-1970s, research sociologists Suzanne Steinmetz, Murray Straus and Richard Gelles found that women perpetrated domestic violence as often as men do. Shortly after publishing their findings, feminist thugs made death threats against the three researchers. When Suzanne Steinmetz’ daughter got married, they also called in a bomb threat to her wedding site. Ironic that the women that deny female-on-male violence make death threats against research sociologists and their family members.
That’s feminist bullshit. Male research subjects were prisoners, aka human lab rats.
When men like you get prostate cancer, you find out that your feminist pals made sure that three times more taxpayer funds are spent on breast cancer than prostate cancer
On the other hand, men are advocating for their issues - and women are joining up. Some of the women have sons in prison after being falsely accused of rape
To follow the rule of law was once a point of pride of the UK. I don’t see how the UK can dare lecture other countries when it can’t follow it’s own laws at home.
Yawn, the narcissistic feminists that only care about women are at it again, No wonder why men board planes for the Philippines, and leave Western women to their cats
The level of misogyny in your comment is off the scale. Not only are you saying that women shouldn’t care about women’s issues, despite centuries of unequal treatment, you’re also belittling them in two very important ways: 1) women who care about women’s issues aren’t worthy of men’s love, and 2) women in countries like the Philippines don’t care about their own rights or issues affecting their sex (in an unpleasant way playing into ugly stereotypes). This is a great example of misogynistic behaviour.
Your comment about feminists caring about women is very funny though. What else are feminists to be worried about? It is in the name.
I said that women who ONLY care about women’s issues, and were indifferent ro male issues, were not worthy of a man’s attention. That’s not “misogyny”, that’s calling a spade a spade,. Men only associate with women that value them
Dude, feminism is about women, not men. It was born out of women’s struggles of living in an unfair and unjust society, and its purpose was to improve the quality of women’s lives. It has nothing to do with men. You can’t call a feminist a narcissist because the focus is on women. The label is on the tin. Admitting this doesn’t diminish the issues of relevance to men. That’s just another space.
Hate for men iis also built into feminism. In the US, feminists in Congress, and their male enablers, created 10 offices for women’s health, but ignored men’s health
There is no hate against men in feminism. As I’ve described it above, feminism focuses on bettering the situation of women. It’s got nothing against or for men. Dealing with men-related issues is something else, deserving of its own advocacy. I hope that you can see these are two different issues and interest in them doesn’t preclude the other.
You say that men would go for women who value and respect them. Don’t forget that this goes both ways. Both partners to a relationship should value and respect each other. It should never be the case that one gives and the other takes.
Here is a feminist page from Stanford University. Notice how they call men’s advocates “bad guys”, and state, “if men are the problem……” That is obvious misandry - hate for men.
https://gender.stanford.edu/news/good-guys-bad-guys-feminist-men-mras-and-quest-moral-redemption
I have received four employment settlements for sex discrimination against men, because the feminists in human resources never even tried to hide their discrimination against men.
In the UK, Erin Pizzey founded the first women’s domestic violence shelter in the mid-1970s. She noticed that many women at the shelter committed acts of violence against other shelter residents. Erin reported that, and feminists in the UK made death threats against her, and chased her out of England.
In the ,mid-1970s, research sociologists Suzanne Steinmetz, Murray Straus and Richard Gelles found that women perpetrated domestic violence as often as men do. Shortly after publishing their findings, feminist thugs made death threats against the three researchers. When Suzanne Steinmetz’ daughter got married, they also called in a bomb threat to her wedding site. Ironic that the women that deny female-on-male violence make death threats against research sociologists and their family members.
That’s feminist bullshit. Male research subjects were prisoners, aka human lab rats.
When men like you get prostate cancer, you find out that your feminist pals made sure that three times more taxpayer funds are spent on breast cancer than prostate cancer
On the other hand, men are advocating for their issues - and women are joining up. Some of the women have sons in prison after being falsely accused of rape
Fine. Men will just seek out the women that DO value and respect men, and are not self-absorbed narcissists.
To follow the rule of law was once a point of pride of the UK. I don’t see how the UK can dare lecture other countries when it can’t follow it’s own laws at home.