In 2021, in the case of FDJ v Secretary of State for Justice, a female prisoner challenged the Ministry of Justice’s policy of housing some men who identify as women in women’s prisons.
So obvious, yet still constantly disputed by "trans allies."
"Trans allies" are by definition misogynists. I am long, long past patience with any of them. Hope they suffer personally for the crimes and abuses they have enabled.
Why is everyone so surprised that self ID invites predators, violent criminals, paedophiles and rapists to suddenly discover their 'female self'?
It was practically an open invitation to a feast of helpless victims in an environment where they couldn't remove or protect themselves, as soon as those men were caught and put to prison. It was always absolutely nonsensical to assume that the most vile and despicable men wouldn't take the chance as soon as they could.
And before anyone claims that certificates mean anything, there's absolutely nothing tangible to discern a trans woman from a pervert man. There's no reliable testing, no possible way to find out if they're honest or that trans even exists. There are no physical indicators, no reliable testing, and the question was a trans woman is has neither ever been asked, nor ever clearly been defined or answered. Therefore, since there's no proper, scientific way to measure trans, any certificate is as worthless as a personal horoscope.
The world created an option for men to bypass all safeguards in existence, and of course the most dangerous and depraved individuals jumped at the chance.
No one thinking about this for longer than two minutes could be surprised by that. And it is high time to stop calling these men trans women.
They're all, every single one of them, violent, male sex offenders who merely accepted the invitation to get access to fresh victims. Therefore, of course, the likelihood that they'll do what they've always done is far higher than the norm in other male criminals.
The only people still clinging to the idea that those are trans people are those who are far too selfish and stubborn to give a damn about women at all. They only want to keep their illusions about trans ideology and their own options for self ID, which makes them despicable, even if they're really just believing they're trans.
😂 what.. that these mentally deranged men in dresses aren't women & don't belong anywhere near real women's Sports & spaces.. fucking wake up idiot 😵💫
I see you framed this in a feminist way. Makes sense. But keep in mind that more women support the trans gender identity nonsense than men. Maybe your appeal is to these women.
I'm not talking about any of that, I'm talking about the reality of sex offenders and how they react if given the chance, that has nothing to do with feminism, that's forensic psychology and criminal science. So again, where exactly do you see a feminist perspective in my comment about the way sex offenders think and act? Please cite the exact passage that's feminist in your opinion.
Well written. The disregard for women’s wellbeing from supposedly caring, empathetic people is astounding.
The common refrains that no one cared about women’s prisons before, that abuse already exists there, and that mechanisms exist to address harm after it occurs all deflect from the central claim: men’s feelings matter more than female safety.
There is no verifiable mechanism to justify taking on faith that a convicted sex offender or murderer becomes statistically less likely to reoffend simply because they identify as a woman internally. The appeal to lower female crime rates does not make sense.
There is no reliable study demonstrating lower risk from men who identify as women to justify such a known risk to women’s safety. A Swedish study actually shows the opposite.
But where should this wonderful ‘lady’ be housed then? The poor dear. Hope they don’t misgender him
https://nypost.com/2026/07/01/us-news/trans-gunman-was-allegedly-plotting-vegas-mass-shooting/
Is it just the late hour, or does that fourth guy look like Ricky Gervais?
So obvious, yet still constantly disputed by "trans allies."
"Trans allies" are by definition misogynists. I am long, long past patience with any of them. Hope they suffer personally for the crimes and abuses they have enabled.
Thanks, great piece and have cross posted
https://dustymasterson.substack.com/p/roxy-tickle-aint-a-sheila
Dusty
Why is everyone so surprised that self ID invites predators, violent criminals, paedophiles and rapists to suddenly discover their 'female self'?
It was practically an open invitation to a feast of helpless victims in an environment where they couldn't remove or protect themselves, as soon as those men were caught and put to prison. It was always absolutely nonsensical to assume that the most vile and despicable men wouldn't take the chance as soon as they could.
And before anyone claims that certificates mean anything, there's absolutely nothing tangible to discern a trans woman from a pervert man. There's no reliable testing, no possible way to find out if they're honest or that trans even exists. There are no physical indicators, no reliable testing, and the question was a trans woman is has neither ever been asked, nor ever clearly been defined or answered. Therefore, since there's no proper, scientific way to measure trans, any certificate is as worthless as a personal horoscope.
The world created an option for men to bypass all safeguards in existence, and of course the most dangerous and depraved individuals jumped at the chance.
No one thinking about this for longer than two minutes could be surprised by that. And it is high time to stop calling these men trans women.
They're all, every single one of them, violent, male sex offenders who merely accepted the invitation to get access to fresh victims. Therefore, of course, the likelihood that they'll do what they've always done is far higher than the norm in other male criminals.
The only people still clinging to the idea that those are trans people are those who are far too selfish and stubborn to give a damn about women at all. They only want to keep their illusions about trans ideology and their own options for self ID, which makes them despicable, even if they're really just believing they're trans.
Exactly.. this 💩 is disgusting & dangerous
Please explain
Don't need to, it's self explanatory idiot 😵💫
And yet you seem to be unable of explaining it.
😂 what.. that these mentally deranged men in dresses aren't women & don't belong anywhere near real women's Sports & spaces.. fucking wake up idiot 😵💫
You misunderstand me. Im dead set against all this trans nonsense.
I see you framed this in a feminist way. Makes sense. But keep in mind that more women support the trans gender identity nonsense than men. Maybe your appeal is to these women.
I think I meant to reply to something else. I agree with what you said.
Happens to the best of us, no harm done, I was just confused ♥️
I wonder what exactly you consider feminist at a statement about male sex offenders.
Im saying you can mostly blame women for supporting the idea of transexuality.
I'm not talking about any of that, I'm talking about the reality of sex offenders and how they react if given the chance, that has nothing to do with feminism, that's forensic psychology and criminal science. So again, where exactly do you see a feminist perspective in my comment about the way sex offenders think and act? Please cite the exact passage that's feminist in your opinion.
Well written. The disregard for women’s wellbeing from supposedly caring, empathetic people is astounding.
The common refrains that no one cared about women’s prisons before, that abuse already exists there, and that mechanisms exist to address harm after it occurs all deflect from the central claim: men’s feelings matter more than female safety.
There is no verifiable mechanism to justify taking on faith that a convicted sex offender or murderer becomes statistically less likely to reoffend simply because they identify as a woman internally. The appeal to lower female crime rates does not make sense.
There is no reliable study demonstrating lower risk from men who identify as women to justify such a known risk to women’s safety. A Swedish study actually shows the opposite.
An adroit, underrated comment. Well said.
Thank you ❤️
Surely the judgement on the Scottish prisons case must be due soon?