Science does not say anything of the sort. Have you any idea what reproduction requires? Men are men. Women are women. If a man wants to wear stereotype ‘female” clothing, he is perpetuating stereotypes & living out his fetish. A man in a dress with a ‘certificate’ is just as much a man as any other and as such he falls within the general percentage of males who may or may not be a threat to women. In a toilet or changing room, a woman has no idea what his intentions are. He is a man. He may be safe, he may not. If he is trying to pass himself off as a woman, his intentions are far more likely to appear - to a woman - to be dishonest and therefore suspect.
Men, clearly, do not understand this. How do we know that this man in the changing room or toilet with us is safe? Is it just because he calls himself a ‘transwoman’? Anyone can call themselves anything. But women know instinctively when a man is present, no matter how pretty his dress or how long his hair. That’s why we don’t challenge. We are on the back foot. And these men’s lack of understanding of this subtle fact is how we know that they have no idea of what it is to ‘be’ a woman. It looks as if they actually think that wearing a dress, growing their hair & taking cross-sex hormones is what does it... WTAF?? This, apparently, is ‘living as a woman’. I’m a woman and I have no idea what they’re talking about. Please do explain what this ‘living as a woman’ is. Is it a dress? Or lipstick? Pouting into a camera lens? Maybe it’s filtered photos on TikTok? Or getting a thrill (or maybe a stiffy 🍆) when a woman walks into the ladies toilets? Please do tell. Because women are fed up with the petulant, selfish, self-absorbed narcissism of these resentful little fetishist tyrants.
People who will not accept reality are fools; people who cannot accept reality are delusionist. Take your pick.
The act of entering a woman's intimate space for private bodily need is ALREADY an act of violation. We don't need to wait to see if he causes additional harm. He has already harmed women by violating our boundaries, which is itself harmful--a form of sexual harassment and psychological abuse.
Women won’t be confronted by a man in the women’s toilets … they will be seeing a trans woman going about their own business, whom wants to be a seen and treated as a woman and doesn’t want to harm women. The only ‘men’ they shouldn’t see are trans men or cis men … but apparently seeing a trans man in there is perfectly fine.
This law just deals with biological sex which numb nuts like you believe is binary, but science says not.
It depends which "intersex" conditions you are talking about. Some be assigned easily to male and female (Kleinfelter and Turner) but some cannot. That's doesn't mean sex isn't binary, it just means some people don't fit in the binary classification. Not everyone has to be assigned to the two categories for them to be valid and problems arise when we attempt to shoe-horn everyone into the two sexes.
The act of entering a woman's intimate space for private bodily need is ALREADY an act of violation. We don't need to wait to see if he causes additional harm. He has already harmed women by violating our boundaries, which is itself harmful--a form of sexual harassment and psychological abuse.
Any man can be violated by other men--disabled men, effeminate gay men, timid men, mentally ill men, incarcerated men, young men, vulnerable boys--not just men who have chosen to cut off their genitals and implant simulated breasts to deceive themselves and others about their sex. Male sexual aggression is a problem that men need to solve, given that men commit more than 95% of all sexual violence.
Also, men who undergo extreme cosmetic procedures to simulate the female body have lower rates of being victimized by men than women do. The claim that they are frequently the victims of sex crimes is based only on a limited set of statistics that apply to men in the sex trade a way of making money that is just as dangerous for women, who are the majority of people trapped in the sex trade.
Also, there are a significant number of men who have undergone sex-deception procedures and have committed sexual violence against women and children, especially men imprisoned with incarcerated women in violation of the international standard for women's human rights.
Thanks, guys, very useful.
I have done analyses of the main parties in the Scottish and Welsh elections:
https://dustymasterson.substack.com/p/the-terven-vote-scottish-parliamentary
https://dustymasterson.substack.com/p/the-terven-vote-the-welsh-senedd
Have cross posted
https://dustymasterson.substack.com/p/king-lear
Dusty
Science does not say anything of the sort. Have you any idea what reproduction requires? Men are men. Women are women. If a man wants to wear stereotype ‘female” clothing, he is perpetuating stereotypes & living out his fetish. A man in a dress with a ‘certificate’ is just as much a man as any other and as such he falls within the general percentage of males who may or may not be a threat to women. In a toilet or changing room, a woman has no idea what his intentions are. He is a man. He may be safe, he may not. If he is trying to pass himself off as a woman, his intentions are far more likely to appear - to a woman - to be dishonest and therefore suspect.
Men, clearly, do not understand this. How do we know that this man in the changing room or toilet with us is safe? Is it just because he calls himself a ‘transwoman’? Anyone can call themselves anything. But women know instinctively when a man is present, no matter how pretty his dress or how long his hair. That’s why we don’t challenge. We are on the back foot. And these men’s lack of understanding of this subtle fact is how we know that they have no idea of what it is to ‘be’ a woman. It looks as if they actually think that wearing a dress, growing their hair & taking cross-sex hormones is what does it... WTAF?? This, apparently, is ‘living as a woman’. I’m a woman and I have no idea what they’re talking about. Please do explain what this ‘living as a woman’ is. Is it a dress? Or lipstick? Pouting into a camera lens? Maybe it’s filtered photos on TikTok? Or getting a thrill (or maybe a stiffy 🍆) when a woman walks into the ladies toilets? Please do tell. Because women are fed up with the petulant, selfish, self-absorbed narcissism of these resentful little fetishist tyrants.
People who will not accept reality are fools; people who cannot accept reality are delusionist. Take your pick.
The act of entering a woman's intimate space for private bodily need is ALREADY an act of violation. We don't need to wait to see if he causes additional harm. He has already harmed women by violating our boundaries, which is itself harmful--a form of sexual harassment and psychological abuse.
Women won’t be confronted by a man in the women’s toilets … they will be seeing a trans woman going about their own business, whom wants to be a seen and treated as a woman and doesn’t want to harm women. The only ‘men’ they shouldn’t see are trans men or cis men … but apparently seeing a trans man in there is perfectly fine.
This law just deals with biological sex which numb nuts like you believe is binary, but science says not.
Actually, sex is binary. The science is clear on that.
where do intersex people sit in this binary landscape
It depends which "intersex" conditions you are talking about. Some be assigned easily to male and female (Kleinfelter and Turner) but some cannot. That's doesn't mean sex isn't binary, it just means some people don't fit in the binary classification. Not everyone has to be assigned to the two categories for them to be valid and problems arise when we attempt to shoe-horn everyone into the two sexes.
The act of entering a woman's intimate space for private bodily need is ALREADY an act of violation. We don't need to wait to see if he causes additional harm. He has already harmed women by violating our boundaries, which is itself harmful--a form of sexual harassment and psychological abuse.
What if they also have breasts and no penis and can be violated in exactly the same way as cis women ?
Any man can be violated by other men--disabled men, effeminate gay men, timid men, mentally ill men, incarcerated men, young men, vulnerable boys--not just men who have chosen to cut off their genitals and implant simulated breasts to deceive themselves and others about their sex. Male sexual aggression is a problem that men need to solve, given that men commit more than 95% of all sexual violence.
Also, men who undergo extreme cosmetic procedures to simulate the female body have lower rates of being victimized by men than women do. The claim that they are frequently the victims of sex crimes is based only on a limited set of statistics that apply to men in the sex trade a way of making money that is just as dangerous for women, who are the majority of people trapped in the sex trade.
Also, there are a significant number of men who have undergone sex-deception procedures and have committed sexual violence against women and children, especially men imprisoned with incarcerated women in violation of the international standard for women's human rights.
Women are not human shields for men.
You can’t prove you’re a woman by behaving like a man 🙂↔️
I agree totally but what does that have to do with this discussion ?
‘Cis’ men and Transwomen are the same thing. There is no difference.
I don’t think so